Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Author Spotlight: Investigating Immune Cell Dynamics in the Tumor Microenvironment — Challenges and Innovations in Cancer Prognosis
Published on: April 12, 2024
Correlation of Cell-in-Cell Structure With Prognosis in Solid Tumors-A Meta-Analysis
Haoyi Zi1,2, Yinhai Dai1,3, Mengxuan Li2
1Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, Shaanxi, China, sntcm.edu.cn.
Background:
Cell-in-cell structures (CICs), a novel biomarker for complex cellular interactions, have garnered increasing attention for their potential in predicting cancer patient prognosis. However, the prognostic significance of CICs in tumor outcomes remains inconclusive. To address this, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the prognostic value of CICs in solid tumors, adhering to the Meta-analyses Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines.
Methods:
PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to October 2024 for the retrieval of full articles. Studies related to the prognosis of cell-in-cell and solid tumors were considered eligible for analysis. The quality of the included studies was assessed according to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Quality assessment tool.
Results:
We included 1836 patients with solid tumors to evaluate the association between overall cell-in-cell structures (oCICs) and prognosis, and 429 patients to evaluate the association between four subtypes of CICs (tumor-in-tumor [TiT], tumor-in-macrophage [TiM], macrophage-in-tumor [MiT], and lymphocyte-in-tumor [LiT]) and prognosis. We present the hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) for the number of CICs for each solid tumor. The combined HR for OS of oCICs was 1.64 (95% CI, 1.18-2.28; p = 0.003), and for LiT, it was 1.43 (95% CI, 1.12-1.83; p = 0.005), indicating that both oCICs and LiT are reliable prognostic factors for solid tumors. However, the combined HRs for OS of TiT, TiM, and MiT were 0.72 (95% CI, 0.35-1.48; p = 0.37), 1.28 (95% CI, 0.67-2.45; p = 0.46), and 1.54 (95% CI, 0.93-2.56; p = 0.09), respectively, suggesting that these subtypes may not be reliable prognostic factors due to the limited number of studies.
Conclusion:
The presence of higher numbers of oCICs and LiT is an adverse prognostic factor for patients and affects OS.
More Related Videos
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...