Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Researchers' roadblocks to including people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (DD) in research:
Karen Bonuck1, Patrick George2, Mark Harniss3
1Professor, Department of Family and Social Medicine, Co-Director University Center of Excellence in Developmental Disabilities, Albert Einstein College of Medicine-Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Abstract:
People with disabilities in the US are now a health disparities population. Though 25% of US adults have a disability, only 5% of medical research grants are disability related. Knowledge about researchers' perceived barriers to including people with disabilities in research has focused on a single disability/condition and thus has limited translational science applications. Our CTSA's Disability as Difference: Reducing Researcher Roadblocks (D2/R3) project examined such roadblocks towards inclusion of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (I/DD). I/DDs are broad, heterogeneous conditions that originate in childhood, have varying impact and function, and persist throughout the lifespan. Strategies that mitigate their under-representation in research will likely have general applicability to all disabilities. In D2/R3's first phase we conducted semi-structured interviews with translational science and I/DD program leaders at ten US institutions about perceived barriers and facilitators to including people with I/DD in research. Interviews were held with 25 individuals from partnering Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Centers, University Centers for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities, and Clinical and Translational Science Award programs. Collaborative thematic coding identified key themes as: attitudinal barriers (e.g., assumptions about consent capacity), logistical barriers (e.g., accommodation costs), health disparities, and generalizability concerns. Findings informed development of a survey based on Prosci's ADKAR® model of change management's five components: Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability and Reinforcement. Exclusion appears to stem from researchers' lack of awareness, misconceptions, and knowledge gaps rather than insurmountable obstacles.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Intellectual Disability
Ethics in Research
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Longitudinal Research
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Somatic...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

