Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Using a Virtual Reality Walking Simulator to Investigate Pedestrian Behavior
Published on: June 9, 2020
Spatial Transferability of Expansion Factors for Estimating Pedestrian Volume at Intersections.
Lucas Tito Pereira Sobreira1, Bruce Hellinga1
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
This study assessed the spatial transferability of pedestrian traffic expansion factors across different jurisdictions. While factors transferred acceptably within similar regions, they performed poorly between dissimilar areas, highlighting limitations for traffic data estimation.
Area of Science:
- Transportation Engineering
- Urban Planning
- Traffic Data Analysis
Background:
- Estimating annual average daily pedestrian traffic (AADPT) is crucial for developing pedestrian-centric urban strategies.
- The expansion factor method, using continuous counts (CCs) to expand short-term counts (STCs), is standard but requires sufficient CC data, which is often lacking.
- This research addresses the challenge of limited CC data by evaluating the spatial transferability of expansion factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the spatial transferability of expansion factors for estimating AADPT across different jurisdictions.
- To compare the effectiveness of the single factor method versus modeling methods for transferring expansion factors.
- To identify the conditions under which expansion factor transferability is reliable for pedestrian traffic estimation.
Main Methods:
- Examined spatial transferability of expansion factors across three Ontario (Canada) jurisdictions and one Arizona (USA) jurisdiction.
- Assumed a 'base jurisdiction' with CCs and a 'target jurisdiction' with only STCs, applying factors from the base to the target.
- Tested two approaches: the single factor method (averaging factors) and modeling methods (assigning STC sites to factor groups).
Main Results:
- The single factor method demonstrated acceptable transferability within the similar Ontario jurisdictions, with a minor increase in error (2.3% absolute, 8.7% relative).
- Poor transferability was observed when attempting to transfer factors between jurisdictions with significantly different characteristics (e.g., Ontario to Arizona).
- Modeling methods produced inconsistent results, potentially due to the limited number of sites in the study, warranting further investigation.
Conclusions:
- Spatial transferability of expansion factors is feasible between jurisdictions with similar seasonality and weather patterns.
- Expansion factors are not reliably transferable between jurisdictions with differing characteristics, limiting the application of the single factor method.
- Further research is needed to refine modeling methods for expansion factor transferability, especially with larger datasets.
Related Concept Videos
Finding Volume Using Cross-Sectional Area
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Areas Within Irregular Boundaries
The Distance Formula
Trapezoidal Rule
Design Example: Measuring Distance Between Two Points with Obstructions

