Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 11, 2026

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
Comparative study of cemented versus screwed prosthesis on the marginal bone stability around dental implants
Vijayalakshmi C R1, Animesh Barodiya2, Ajay Gaikwad3
1Department of Prosthodontics, BGS Global Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Bengaluru, India.
None:
Cemented versus screw-retained implant crowns effects on peri-implant bone stability remain controversial despite widespread clinical use. Therefore, it is of interest to compare 38 cemented and 38 screw-retained single-implant crowns in posterior sites across 68 patients over 24 months. Screw-retained crowns showed significantly lower mean marginal bone loss (0.68 ± 0.29 mm vs. 1.12 ± 0.34 mm, p<0.001) at 24 months. Excess cement occurred in 34% of cemented cases, strongly correlating with bone loss (r=0.71, p<0.001). Screw retention demonstrates superior bone preservation and reduced biological complications, advancing evidence-based single-implant crown selection.
More Related Videos
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
06:41A Minimally Invasive Model to Analyze Endochondral Fracture Healing in Mice Under Standardized Biomechanical Conditions
Published on: March 22, 2018