Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

Testing the Efficacy of Pharmacological Agents in a Pericardial Target Delivery Model in the Swine
Published on: July 7, 2016
EFFICACY OF PERINDOPRIL IN PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE AND REDUCED EJECTION FRACTION
N Nazghaidze1, Sh Petriashvili2, R Agladze3
11David Aghmashenebeli University of Georgia - SDASU; Department of Cardiology, "Caucasus Medical Center", Tbilisi, Georgia.
Insights
Perindopril effectively improves heart function and reduces cardiac remodeling in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients, showing comparable results to sacubitril/valsartan with a favorable safety profile.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a significant global health issue with high mortality.
- Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are crucial for HFrEF management, but specific data on perindopril's efficacy is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of perindopril versus sacubitril/valsartan in HFrEF patients regarding therapeutic effects and reverse cardiac remodeling.
- To evaluate clinical outcomes and safety profiles of these treatments in routine clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective cohort study of 214 HFrEF patients (LVEF<40%) treated with either perindopril or sacubitril/valsartan.
- Assessment of clinical, echocardiographic, and biochemical parameters at baseline, 2-3 weeks, and 3-6 months.
- Primary endpoints included changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class.
Main Results:
- Both perindopril and sacubitril/valsartan significantly improved LVEF, reduced left ventricular dimensions, and decreased pulmonary artery systolic pressure.
- Perindopril showed a significant increase in LVEF (34.3% to 41.3%), while sacubitril/valsartan showed an increase from 30.8% to 33.8%.
- Treatment group, baseline LVEF, and de novo heart failure were independent predictors of follow-up LVEF; NYHA class improved significantly in both groups without significant changes in renal function or potassium levels. One-year mortality was comparable.
Conclusions:
- Perindopril therapy leads to significant clinical improvement, LVEF recovery, and reverse cardiac remodeling in HFrEF patients.
- Perindopril and sacubitril/valsartan demonstrated comparable efficacy in reducing cardiac dimensions and improving NYHA functional status.
- Perindopril exhibits a favorable safety profile with low nephrotoxicity, supporting its role in HFrEF management.
Background/Introduction:
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) represents a major global health burden, accounting for approximately half of all heart failure cases and characterized by high mortality, frequent hospitalizations, and progressive cardiac remodeling. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors constitute a foundational cornerstone in the therapeutic management of HFrEF. Perindopril is a long-acting ACE inhibitor with a highly favorable safety profile; however, robust clinical data evaluating its specific efficacy in HFrEF cohorts remain scarce.
Aim:
To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy, reverse cardiac remodeling, and clinical outcomes of perindopril versus sacubitril/valsartan in patients with HFrEF in routine clinical practice.
Methods:
This retrospective cohort study included 214 HFrEF patients (LVEF<40%, mean age 64.8±11.0 years) treated at Tbilisi Heart Center between 2018 and 2025. Patients received GDMT and were divided into two groups: Perindopril (n=118) and Sacubitril/Valsartan (n=96). Clinical, echocardiographic, and biochemical metrics were assessed at baseline (Visit 1), 2-3 weeks (Visit 2), and 3-6 months (Visit 3). Primary endpoints included changes in LVEF and NYHA functional class.
Results:
• Both treatment strategies significantly improved LVEF, reduced left ventricular dimensions (LVEDD, LVESD), and decreased pulmonary artery systolic pressure (ANOVA p < 0.01), with major reverse remodeling occurring between Visits 1 and 2. • LVEF increased from 34.3±3.9% to 41.3±7.4% in the perindopril group and from 30.8±5.2% to 33.8±8.1% in the sacubitril/valsartan group. • In multivariable linear regression analysis, treatment group (B=-3.170, p=0.004), baseline LVEF (B=0.381, p=0.005), and de novo heart failure (B=2.966, p=0.005) were independent predictors of follow-up LVEF. • Both cohorts showed significant longitudinal optimization in NYHA functional class (p<0.001). No significant changes in serum potassium or renal function were observed. One-year all-cause mortality did not differ significantly between groups (33.1% vs. 22.9%, p=0.103).
Conclusion:
Perindopril therapy is associated with significant clinical improvement, LVEF recovery, and positive reverse cardiac remodeling in patients with HFrEF. Both perindopril and sacubitril/valsartan demonstrate comparable efficacy in reducing cardiac dimensions and optimizing NYHA functional status. Furthermore, perindopril maintains a favorable safety profile with low nephrotoxicity, confirming its potential as an effective therapeutic option in HFrEF management.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
