Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual evoked potentials following abrupt contrast changes

D Xin1, W Seiple, K Holopigian

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, New York University Medical Center, NY 10016.

Vision Research
|November 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical endpoints special session, ISCEV 2025, Utrecht.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
Same author

[Epidemiological characteristics and serum antibody detection of a COVID-19 aggregated outbreak in vaccinated population].

Zhonghua yu fang yi xue za zhi [Chinese journal of preventive medicine]·2023
Same author

[Establishment and validation of prognostic risk score model for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on immune related genes].

Zhonghua zhong liu za zhi [Chinese journal of oncology]·2021
Same author

CircRNA_100782 promotes roliferation and metastasis of gastric cancer by downregulating tumor suppressor gene Rb by adsorbing miR-574-3p in a sponge form.

European review for medical and pharmacological sciences·2020
Same author

Anatomic morphological study of thoracolumbar foramen in normal adults.

Folia morphologica·2020
Same author

[Resistance mechanism of programmed death-1 antibody].

Zhonghua zhong liu za zhi [Chinese journal of oncology]·2018
Same journal

Editorial for VSI Amblyopia: Advances in Amblyopia Research.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Visual evoked potential (VEP) timing shows delays in amplitude and phase changes after contrast shifts. These delays vary with contrast magnitude, direction, and spatial frequency, impacting threshold estimations.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Psychophysics
  • Ophthalmology

Background:

  • Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) are crucial for assessing visual pathway function.
  • Understanding VEP response dynamics to contrast changes is vital for accurate visual system evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the timing of visual evoked potential (VEP) amplitude and phase shifts in response to abrupt contrast changes.
  • To determine how stimulus parameters like contrast magnitude, direction, and spatial frequency influence VEP response latency.

Main Methods:

  • Presented gratings at varying contrasts (low to high and vice versa) for fixed durations.
  • Continuously recorded and averaged second harmonic VEP amplitude and phase in 1-second epochs.
  • Analyzed time constants for amplitude and phase stabilization following contrast steps.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Both VEP amplitude and phase showed delays in reaching stable levels post-contrast change.
  • Amplitude response delays depended on contrast step size, direction, and spatial frequency.
  • Phase response timing was largely independent of contrast step size for increases but showed some dependence for decreases.
  • Amplitude time constants increased with spatial frequency, while phase time constants remained consistent.

Conclusions:

  • VEP amplitude and phase dynamics exhibit complex dependencies on stimulus contrast and spatial frequency.
  • Signal averaging techniques may not always capture a unitary neural process.
  • Swept stimulus VEP methods risk significant threshold estimation errors based on stimulus characteristics.