Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is it true that the differences in reading performance between students with and without LD cannot be explained by

J E Jiménez Glez1, M Rodrigo López

  • 1Facultad de Psicologia, Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife (Islas Canarias), España.

Journal of Learning Disabilities
|March 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

Intelligence quotient (IQ) does not explain reading differences in children with learning disabilities (LD). Lexical processing difficulties in LD students are influenced by phonological skills, not IQ.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Associations Between Self-Reported Literacy and Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in Children, Adolescents, and Older Adults.

Journal of learning disabilities·2026
Same journal

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Learning Disabilities Identification in U.S. Elementary Schools.

Journal of learning disabilities·2026
Same journal

Universal Screening of Early Numeracy Skills in Spanish-Speaking Kindergarteners.

Journal of learning disabilities·2026
Same journal

AI Chatbots and Dyslexia: How AI Chatbots Empower Students With Dyslexia to Master Arithmetic Word Problems.

Journal of learning disabilities·2026
Same journal

Instructional Decision-Making for Students With Intensive Early Writing Needs: Student Growth in Sentence-Level Curriculum-Based Measurement.

Journal of learning disabilities·2026
Same journal

Effects of Calculation and Reading Fluency Interventions Focusing on Awareness and Adaptive Use of Strategies: Supporting Children With Comorbid Fluency Problems.

Journal of learning disabilities·2026

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Educational Psychology

Background:

  • Reading disabilities present significant challenges for academic achievement.
  • Understanding the cognitive underpinnings of reading difficulties is crucial for effective intervention.
  • The role of general intelligence (IQ) in explaining these differences requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether IQ accounts for variations in lexical processing between students with learning disabilities (LD) and non-learning disabled (NLD) students.
  • To examine the influence of word and pseudoword parameters on lexical decision-making in these groups.
  • To determine the relationship between phonological skills and lexical processing in children with and without LD.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • A lexical decision task was administered to 133 Spanish children aged 8-13.
  • Participants were classified into LD and NLD groups and further categorized by IQ levels using the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised.
  • Word parameters (length, frequency, familiarity) and pseudoword parameters (length, frequency) were manipulated.

Main Results:

  • Intelligence quotient (IQ) did not explain the observed differences in lexical processing between LD and NLD students.
  • Lexical and sublexical parameters significantly impacted performance more in the LD group compared to the NLD group, irrespective of IQ.
  • Students with LD demonstrated greater difficulty in lexical processing.

Conclusions:

  • The findings suggest that IQ is not the primary factor explaining reading differences in children with LD.
  • Lexical processing in students with LD is significantly influenced by word characteristics and phonological skills.
  • Difficulties in phonological processing appear to be a key factor contributing to the lexical processing challenges faced by students with learning disabilities.