Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Biopsy needle susceptibility artifacts

M E Ladd1, P Erhart, J F Debatin

  • 1Department of Radiology, University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland.

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
|October 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Blood Flow Velocity Analysis in Cerebral Perforating Arteries on 7T 2D Phase Contrast MRI with an Open-Source Software Tool (SELMA).

Neuroinformatics·2025
Same author

Erratum to: Fast and accurate multi-channel B1+ mapping based on the TIAMO technique for 7 Tesla UHF body MRI (Magn Reson Med 2018;79:2652-2664).

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2023
Same author

Radiomics in diffusion data: a test-retest, inter- and intra-reader DWI phantom study.

Clinical radiology·2020
Same author

What remains after transient global amnesia (TGA)? An ultra-high field 7 T magnetic resonance imaging study of the hippocampus.

European journal of neurology·2019
Same author

Wall Contrast Enhancement of Thrombosed Intracranial Aneurysms at 7T MRI.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2019
Same author

Visualization and Classification of Deeply Seated Collateral Networks in Moyamoya Angiopathy with 7T MRI.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2018
Same journal

Suppression of Oscillation and Ghosting in RF-Spoiled Gradient-Echo-Based Dynamic Imaging.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Simple, Dynamic Geometric Phantom for MRI and CT Reconstruction Pipelines: Beyond Shepp-Logan.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

7T 3D-EPI PCASL With High SNR Efficiency and Robustness to Through-Plane B<sub>0</sub> Field Gradients.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Comparison of Tissue Property Values Estimated Using Conventional Cardiac MRF and MT-Cardiac MRF.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Dependence of the Extra-Cellular Diffusion Coefficient on the Fractions of Neurites and Cell Bodies in Gray Matter.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Triple-Pulse <sup>23</sup>Na MRI Sequence (TriNa) for Simultaneous Acquisition of Spin-Density-Weighted and Fluid-Attenuated Images.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) artifact visibility from metallic needles varies. Simulations reveal artifact size and center shift depend on needle properties and imaging parameters, limiting MRI-guided needle placement accuracy.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Physics

Background:

  • Metallic instruments are used in percutaneous interventions guided by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).
  • The visibility of these instruments in MRI is enhanced due to magnetic susceptibility differences, beyond simple water displacement.
  • This enhanced visibility is variable and influenced by multiple factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and simulate the image distortion caused by magnetic susceptibility differences between metallic needles and surrounding tissues in MRI.
  • To understand the factors influencing the appearance and accuracy of MRI-guided needle placement.

Main Methods:

  • Computer simulations were employed to model image distortion.
  • Simulations analyzed the effects of magnetic susceptibility differences between needles and tissue.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Parameters such as needle composition, orientation, and pulse sequence were evaluated.

    • Main Results:

    • Simulated image distortion showed dependency on needle composition, orientation, and pulse sequence.
    • A shift in the artifact center away from the actual needle center was observed.
    • The size of the artifact was not constant and varied with imaging parameters.

    Conclusions:

    • The artifactual visibility of metallic needles in MRI is complex and not solely due to water displacement.
    • Variations in artifact size and center position limit the precision of MRI-guided needle tip placement.
    • Understanding these simulation results is crucial for improving MRI-guided interventions.