Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Selective attention to elements in working memory.

Klaus Oberauer1

  • 1University of Potsdam, Germany. ko@rz.uni-potsdam.de

Experimental Psychology
|November 1, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reliability, bias, and computational cost of estimating the Bayes factor using bridge sampling and the Savage-Dickey density ratio.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

The role of eye movements and covert shifts of attention in working and long-term memory retrieval.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

How is free time used in complex span tasks?

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Does the benefit of time for working memory arise at encoding or retrieval?

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Revisiting the retro-cue benefit: Why does focusing attention result in improved memory performance?

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Forget For Now, but Remember Later: Can People Selectively Remove Information From Working Memory While Keeping it in Long-Term Memory?

Journal of cognition·2026
Same journal

Error Cancellation During Early Task Performance.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Test Format Matching Moderates the Forward Testing Effect.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Affective-Motivational Task Content and Stimulus Size Modulate Cognitive Control in Task Switching.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

The Effect of Violent Virtual Avatar Experience on Players' Response Inhibition to Angry Expressions and Its Cognitive Neural Mechanisms.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Same Person, Different Personality?

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Competition Matters!

Experimental psychology·2026
See all related articles

This study investigated the object switch effect in working memory. Findings reveal distinct components contributing to object switch costs, independent of task demands like selective access or updating.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Memory

Background:

  • The object switch effect, initially linked to attention focus in working memory, requires further investigation.
  • Previous interpretations of object switch costs may be confounded by task-specific demands.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To isolate and characterize the components of the object switch effect in working memory.
  • To differentiate the roles of selective access and updating in object switch costs.
  • To examine factors influencing object switch costs, such as memory set size.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments using an arithmetic working memory task were conducted.
  • Tasks varied in requirements for selective access and updating of working memory contents.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Object switch costs were measured under different experimental conditions.
  • Main Results:

    • Object switch costs were observed in tasks requiring selective access but not updating.
    • Object switch costs were also found in tasks requiring updating but not selective access.
    • Switch costs increased with memory set size and were smaller for switches to items of the same type.

    Conclusions:

    • Object switch costs comprise at least two distinct components.
    • These components are dissociable based on task demands related to selective access and updating.
    • The findings refine our understanding of attentional mechanisms within working memory.