Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Usability assessment of pacemaker programmers.

Christine C Chiu1, Kim J Vicente, Ilan Buffo-Sequeira

  • 1Division of Cardiology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. christine.chiu-man@sickkids.ca

Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology : PACE
|October 30, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Researching COVID to enhance recovery (RECOVER) pediatric study protocol: Rationale, objectives and design.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2023
Same author

Hybrid palliation versus nonhybrid management for a multi-institutional cohort of infants with critical left heart obstruction.

The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2023
Same author

Patient-Reported Outcomes After Tetralogy of Fallot Repair.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2023
Same author

Endothelial Function in Youth With Bipolar Disorder: Preliminary Evidence for Mood Polarity Differences.

The Journal of clinical psychiatry·2023
Same author

Looking Backward and Forward: The Cardiovascular Complications of COVID-19.

The Canadian journal of cardiology·2023
Same author

Imaging the delayed complications of childhood Kawasaki disease.

F1000Research·2023
Same journal

Vein of Marshall Alcohol Ablation Facilitated by a 10-French Bidirectional Catheter Supported by Glide Advantage Wire.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

Leadless Pacemaker Implantation in High-Risk Patients: Real-World Outcomes From a Multicenter Israeli Registry.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

Sex Differences in the Burden of Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter and Associated Heart Failure Stratified by Age at Onset.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

Syncope due to Pacing Inhibition During VT Detection in a Conduction System Pacing ICD Programmed in AAI(R) Mode.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

When Less Is Too Little: Low Atrioventricular Synchrony by VDD Leadless Pacemaker in a Patient With Glenn Circulation.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

Temporal Changes in Left Ventricular Strain in Typical and Atypical Left Bundle Branch Block Patients: A Follow-up Study.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
See all related articles

Pacemaker programmer usability varies significantly, impacting safe patient care. Design guidelines are needed to improve user interface consistency and functionality for clinicians.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Medical Device Usability

Background:

  • Clinicians perceive usability differences in pacemaker programmers.
  • Limited scientific literature exists on pacemaker programmer user interface usability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe and quantify usability differences among pacemaker programmers from various manufacturers.
  • To identify specific usability issues and violations of general usability principles.

Main Methods:

  • Self-administered questionnaires completed by 42 pacemaker programmer users.
  • Independent heuristic evaluations by two usability experts.
  • Evaluation of programmers from seven different manufacturers (coded A-G).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Significant differences found in overall user satisfaction and ease of use (P < 0.0001).
  • Usability varied across display, controls, operation, and physical dimensions (P < 0.05).
  • Frequent usability principle violations identified, including reliance on recall and inconsistent controls.

Conclusions:

  • Pacemaker programmer interface designs often fail to meet user needs and established usability principles.
  • Inconsistent design impacts the safe and effective use of these critical medical devices.
  • Development of design guidelines for pacemaker programmers is recommended, focusing on critical controls.