Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Inhibiting responses when switching: Does it matter?

Frederick Verbruggen1, Baptist Liefooghe, Arnaud Szmalec

  • 1Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium. frederick.verbruggen@ugent.be

Experimental Psychology
|April 27, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

Neophobia and motivation in birds: A gene expression study informed by reinforcement sensitivity theory.

Behavioural brain research·2026
Same author

Navigating the unknown: how exploratory traits shape juvenile post-fledging behaviour and survival in gulls.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Unpacking response Inhibition in animals - part 2: an empirical test.

Animal cognition·2026
Same author

Habitat selection of three gull species in response to sudden changes in human mobility.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Unpacking response inhibition in animals - part 1: a conceptual framework.

Animal cognition·2026
Same journal

Error Cancellation During Early Task Performance.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Test Format Matching Moderates the Forward Testing Effect.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Affective-Motivational Task Content and Stimulus Size Modulate Cognitive Control in Task Switching.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

The Effect of Violent Virtual Avatar Experience on Players' Response Inhibition to Angry Expressions and Its Cognitive Neural Mechanisms.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Same Person, Different Personality?

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Competition Matters!

Experimental psychology·2026
See all related articles

This study found that response inhibition does not affect task-switching costs, and task-switching does not impact stopping performance. These cognitive processes appear to use separate underlying mechanisms.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Task-switching involves cognitive flexibility, while response inhibition controls impulses.
  • Previous research suggests potential interactions between these executive functions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the interaction between response inhibition and cued task-switching.
  • To determine if response inhibition influences task-switching costs.
  • To examine if task-switching affects stopping performance.

Main Methods:

  • Combined the cued task-switching paradigm with the stop-signal paradigm.
  • Analyzed trial processing times and stopping performance metrics.
  • Compared switch and repetition trials following inhibited responses.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Switch and repetition trials after response inhibition were processed equally fast, eliminating switch costs.
  • Stopping performance was unaffected by task-switching.
  • Stop-signal latencies were similar across trial types, but delays were longer for switch trials.

Conclusions:

  • Response inhibition and task-switching do not share a common underlying mechanism.
  • Inhibition following stop-signal trials reduces interference in task-switching.
  • Task-switching does not impair the ability to inhibit responses.