Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interference produces different forgetting rates for implicit and explicit knowledge.

Ricardo Tamayo1, Peter A Frensch

  • 1Institut für Psychologie, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany. rtamayo@cms.hu-berlin.de

Experimental Psychology
|October 24, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cross-sectional online survey of the impact of new tobacco health warnings in Colombia.

BMJ open·2022
Same author

Lack of Automatic Vocal Response Learning While Reading Aloud.

Experimental psychology·2019
Same author

Incidental covariation learning leading to strategy change.

PloS one·2019
Same author

Mental capacity in Colombia: a comparison with the UK.

BJPsych international·2018
Same author

Berlin declaration on the quality of life for older adults: closing the gap between scientific knowledge and intervention.

European journal of ageing·2017
Same author

Tied to expectations: Predicting features speeds processing even under adverse circumstances.

Memory & cognition·2016
Same journal

Error Cancellation During Early Task Performance.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Test Format Matching Moderates the Forward Testing Effect.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Affective-Motivational Task Content and Stimulus Size Modulate Cognitive Control in Task Switching.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

The Effect of Violent Virtual Avatar Experience on Players' Response Inhibition to Angry Expressions and Its Cognitive Neural Mechanisms.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Same Person, Different Personality?

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Competition Matters!

Experimental psychology·2026
See all related articles

Artificial grammar learning creates explicit and implicit knowledge. While implicit knowledge persists, explicit knowledge significantly declines over a week, a pattern not caused by item repetition but potentially by interference.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Artificial Grammar Learning

Background:

  • Artificial grammar learning (AGL) generates both explicit and implicit knowledge.
  • Previous studies indicate implicit knowledge is retained longer than explicit knowledge after a retention interval.
  • The assessment methods for explicit and implicit knowledge in AGL are crucial for understanding memory consolidation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To replicate and extend previous findings on the differential retention of explicit and implicit knowledge in AGL.
  • To investigate whether item repetition at assessment influences recognition memory for explicit knowledge.
  • To explore the role of interference in the observed pattern of knowledge retention.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted involving exposure to artificial grammar strings in a speeded matching task.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Explicit knowledge was assessed using recognition tasks, while implicit knowledge was assessed using priming measures.
  • Experiment 1 partially replicated a previous study, including variations in test item presentation.
  • Experiment 2 introduced interference paradigms to test theoretical explanations.

    • Main Results:

    • Experiment 1 confirmed that recognition (explicit knowledge) significantly declined after a one-week interval, independent of test item repetition.
    • Recognition scores were validated as measures of explicit knowledge.
    • Experiment 2 demonstrated that interference can account for the observed pattern of explicit and implicit knowledge retention.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings support the dissociation between explicit and implicit knowledge retention in artificial grammar learning.
    • Recognition tasks reliably measure explicit knowledge, which is susceptible to forgetting over time.
    • Interference is a significant factor influencing the persistence of explicit knowledge in AGL paradigms.