Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in human cognition.Types of...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Interpretations of Partial Derivatives01:14

Interpretations of Partial Derivatives

A surface defined by a function of two variables can be visualized as a vast, uneven terrain, where each point is identified using Cartesian coordinates. The elevation of the terrain at any point is determined by a function that assigns a height value to every pair of horizontal coordinates. This representation allows the surface to be studied in terms of how its height varies across different directions.At a specific point on this terrain, understanding how the height changes requires...
Conditions on Early Earth02:06

Conditions on Early Earth

Around 4 billion years ago, oceans began to condense on earth while volcanic eruptions released nitrogen, carbon dioxide, methane, ammonia, and hydrogen into the primordial atmosphere. However, organisms with the characteristics of life were not initially present on earth. Scientists have used experimentation to determine how organisms evolved that could grow, reproduce, and maintain an internal environment.
Conditions on Early Earth02:06

Conditions on Early Earth

Around 4 billion years ago, oceans began to condense on earth while volcanic eruptions released nitrogen, carbon dioxide, methane, ammonia, and hydrogen into the primordial atmosphere. However, organisms with the characteristics of life were not initially present on earth. Scientists have used experimentation to determine how organisms evolved that could grow, reproduce, and maintain an internal environment.
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

When Do Generics Feel Justifiable? A Registered Report Bridging Key Theories.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same author

Some scales require cognitive effort: A systematic review on the role of working memory in scalar implicature derivation.

Cognition·2023
Same author

Motor imagery and engagement favour spatial reasoning.

Memory & cognition·2022
Same author

Find extra options or reason badly: An investigation of children's reasoning with incompatibility statements.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2021
Same author

The Role of Working Memory in the Processing of Scalar Implicatures of Patients With Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders.

Frontiers in psychology·2021
Same author

What is the contribution of executive functions to communicative-pragmatic skills? Insights from aging and different types of pragmatic inference.

Cognitive processing·2021
Same journal

Error Cancellation During Early Task Performance.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Test Format Matching Moderates the Forward Testing Effect.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Affective-Motivational Task Content and Stimulus Size Modulate Cognitive Control in Task Switching.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

The Effect of Violent Virtual Avatar Experience on Players' Response Inhibition to Angry Expressions and Its Cognitive Neural Mechanisms.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Same Person, Different Personality?

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Competition Matters!

Experimental psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

"The" interpretation(s) of conditionals.

Walter Schroyens1, Walter Schaeken, Kristien Dieussaert

  • 1Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Gent, Belgium. walter.schroyens@ugent.be

Experimental Psychology
|June 14, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People often ignore false antecedents when judging conditional statements. New research shows priming participants to consider truth and consistency encourages them to account for these overlooked cases.

More Related Videos

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Logic and Reasoning

Background:

  • Recent studies show people equate conditional probability P(if A then C) with P(A given C).
  • This suggests people often disregard cases where the antecedent (A) is false when evaluating conditionals.
  • This finding challenges the model theory of Johnson-Laird and Byrne (2002), which posits multiple interpretations of 'if'.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the flexibility of human interpretation of conditional statements.
  • To provide evidence supporting the model theory's claim about the varied interpretations of 'if'.
  • To explore methods for eliciting interpretations that include false-antecedent cases.

Main Methods:

  • Participants were primed to consider the truth conditions of conditionals.
  • One priming condition involved distinguishing between 'if A then C' and 'if A then possibly C'.
  • Another condition asked participants to judge situations consistent with a conditional.

Main Results:

  • Priming participants to think about truth and consistency increased their likelihood of considering false-antecedent cases.
  • Participants exposed to these conditions selected probability estimates that accounted for false-antecedent scenarios.
  • This demonstrates a greater flexibility in interpreting conditional statements than previously assumed.

Conclusions:

  • Human interpretation of conditional statements is more flexible than suggested by previous probability judgments.
  • Cognitive priming can shift interpretation to include false-antecedent cases, supporting the model theory.
  • Understanding these interpretive nuances is crucial for cognitive science and artificial intelligence.