Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
Buffer Effectiveness02:19

Buffer Effectiveness

Buffer solutions do not have an unlimited capacity to keep the pH relatively constant . Instead, the ability of a buffer solution to resist changes in pH relies on the presence of appreciable amounts of its conjugate weak acid-base pair. When enough strong acid or base is added to substantially lower the concentration of either member of the buffer pair, the buffering action within the solution is compromised.
The buffer capacity is the amount of acid or base that can be added to a given volume...
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked.  In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence the...
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked.  In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Detection of culprit presence in multiple-culprit crimes: A comparison of combined and separate lineup-presentation formats.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Validating a multinomial processing tree model for measuring confidence in lineups using a post-response feedback manipulation.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026
Same author

Accuracy in parameter estimation and simulation approaches for sample-size planning accounting for item effects.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Crowdsourcing multiverse analyses to explore the impact of different data-processing and analysis decisions: A tutorial.

Psychological methods·2025
Same author

Adaptive memory: The effects of survival-constrained retrieval on recognition depend on initial encoding conditions.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

Delays reduce culprit-presence detection but do not affect guessing-based selection in response to lineups.

Scientific reports·2025
Same journal

Error Cancellation During Early Task Performance.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Test Format Matching Moderates the Forward Testing Effect.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Affective-Motivational Task Content and Stimulus Size Modulate Cognitive Control in Task Switching.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

The Effect of Violent Virtual Avatar Experience on Players' Response Inhibition to Angry Expressions and Its Cognitive Neural Mechanisms.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Same Person, Different Personality?

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Competition Matters!

Experimental psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

Irrelevant speech disrupts item-context binding.

Raoul Bell1, Jan P Röer, Axel Buchner

  • 1Department of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Germany.

Experimental Psychology
|July 4, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Irrelevant speech significantly impairs immediate memory by disrupting both item recall and the association between items and their context. This finding suggests auditory distractors have broader effects on memory than previously understood.

More Related Videos

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

Modeling Verbal Behavior Deficits with the Stimulus Control Ratio Equation, SCoRE
06:57

Modeling Verbal Behavior Deficits with the Stimulus Control Ratio Equation, SCoRE

Published on: May 14, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

Modeling Verbal Behavior Deficits with the Stimulus Control Ratio Equation, SCoRE
06:57

Modeling Verbal Behavior Deficits with the Stimulus Control Ratio Equation, SCoRE

Published on: May 14, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Auditory Perception
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Previous studies suggested irrelevant speech primarily impairs serial order memory.
  • This impairment was attributed to disrupted links between adjacent items in a sequence.
  • An alternative explanation proposed general disruption of item-context bindings by auditory distractors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the broader effects of irrelevant speech on immediate memory.
  • To test the hypothesis that auditory distractors impair general item-context binding capacity.
  • To differentiate between effects on item memory versus item-context associations.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Assessed memory for item-color associations and item-serial position under irrelevant speech conditions.
  • Experiment 2: Examined the impact of irrelevant sound on both item memory and item-context binding.
  • Utilized immediate memory tasks with auditory distraction paradigms.

Main Results:

  • Irrelevant speech significantly impaired memory for item-color associations, similar to serial order memory impairment.
  • Both item memory and item-context binding were disrupted by irrelevant speech.
  • Auditory distractors demonstrated a generalized disruptive effect on immediate memory components.

Conclusions:

  • The disruptive effects of irrelevant sound on immediate memory are more general than previously assumed.
  • Auditory distractors impair the fundamental capacity to form and maintain item-context bindings.
  • Findings have significant theoretical implications for memory models and practical applications in noisy environments.