Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

11:00
Reliable Acquisition of Electroencephalography Data during Simultaneous Electroencephalography and Functional MRI
Published on: March 19, 2021
Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI
Jonathan D Power1, Anish Mitra, Timothy O Laumann
1Dept. of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Neuroimage
|September 3, 2013
Summary
Head motion significantly impacts resting-state functional connectivity MRI (RSFC) by altering signal intensity and correlations. A censoring strategy effectively reduces motion-related artifacts, improving data quality.
Area of Science:
- Neuroimaging
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Biophysics
Background:
- Resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) fMRI is crucial for understanding brain function.
- Head motion is a significant confound in RSFC studies, systematically altering connectivity measures.
- The precise impact of motion on signal intensity and correlations requires detailed examination.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how head motion affects signal intensity and RSFC correlations.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of different artifact removal strategies, including global signal regression and censoring.
- To identify reliable metrics for assessing data quality in the presence of motion.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of motion-induced signal changes in fMRI data, characterizing their waveform, spatial extent, and temporal persistence.
- Assessment of RSFC correlations during and after motion, examining distance-dependent effects.
- Comparison of motion-correction techniques: motion-based regressors, global signal regression, and volume censoring.
Main Results:
- Motion-induced signal changes are complex, widespread, and can persist long after motion stops.
- These signal changes increase RSFC correlations in a distance-dependent manner.
- Global signal regression effectively reduces motion artifacts, while motion-based regressors are less effective. Volume censoring significantly reduces group differences due to motion.
Conclusions:
- Head motion introduces systematic biases in RSFC, which are not always corrected by standard methods.
- Global signal regression and volume censoring are effective strategies for mitigating motion artifacts.
- Careful artifact removal is essential for accurate interpretation of RSFC findings and data quality assessment.
