Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

1.3K
Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this...
1.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ending publication bias: A values-based approach to surface null and negative results.

PLoS biology·2025
Same author

Rethinking the Role of Teams and Training in Geopolitical Forecasting: The Effect of Uncontrolled Method Variance on Statistical Conclusions.

Psychological science·2024
Same author

A memory-theoretic account of citation propagation.

Royal Society open science·2024
Same author

In-person to virtual interprofessional education: Teamwork attitudes and skills among dental and dental hygiene students.

Journal of dental education·2024
Same author

Overlapping and unique brain responses to cognitive and response inhibition.

Brain and cognition·2023
Same author

Correspondence between cognitive and neural representations for phonology, orthography, and semantics in supramarginal compared to angular gyrus.

Brain structure & function·2022
Same journal

Error Cancellation During Early Task Performance.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Test Format Matching Moderates the Forward Testing Effect.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Affective-Motivational Task Content and Stimulus Size Modulate Cognitive Control in Task Switching.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

The Effect of Violent Virtual Avatar Experience on Players' Response Inhibition to Angry Expressions and Its Cognitive Neural Mechanisms.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Same Person, Different Personality?

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Competition Matters!

Experimental psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function
06:17

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.7K

Measuring working memory is all fun and games: a four-dimensional spatial game predicts cognitive task performance.

Sharona M Atkins1, Amber M Sprenger1, Gregory J H Colflesh2

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, <location>College Park, MD, USA</location>

Experimental Psychology
|June 26, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We created Shapebuilder, a new four-dimensional spatial task, to measure cognitive abilities. This task effectively predicts performance on complex working memory and reasoning tasks, offering a reliable and language-independent assessment.

Keywords:
N-backcapacitycognitive abilitygo/no-goworking memory

More Related Videos

An Appetitive Spatial Working Memory Task for Mice in a Semi-Automated 8-Arm Radial Maze, Reducing Fearful Memory Association in the Maze
14:24

An Appetitive Spatial Working Memory Task for Mice in a Semi-Automated 8-Arm Radial Maze, Reducing Fearful Memory Association in the Maze

Published on: July 29, 2025

1.8K
The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

11.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function
06:17

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.7K
An Appetitive Spatial Working Memory Task for Mice in a Semi-Automated 8-Arm Radial Maze, Reducing Fearful Memory Association in the Maze
14:24

An Appetitive Spatial Working Memory Task for Mice in a Semi-Automated 8-Arm Radial Maze, Reducing Fearful Memory Association in the Maze

Published on: July 29, 2025

1.8K
The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

11.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Assessing complex working memory (WM) is crucial for understanding cognitive abilities.
  • Existing WM measures may have limitations such as language dependency or susceptibility to ceiling effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and validate a novel four-dimensional spatial task, Shapebuilder.
  • To evaluate Shapebuilder's predictive validity for a range of cognitive tasks.
  • To establish Shapebuilder as a reliable and efficient measure of working memory.

Main Methods:

  • Development of the Shapebuilder task, a novel four-dimensional spatial assessment.
  • Six experiments were conducted to assess Shapebuilder's psychometric properties and predictive validity.
  • Correlations were examined between Shapebuilder and various established cognitive tasks, including complex WM span, quantitative reasoning, Raven's Progressive Matrices, go/no-go, N-back, Attention Networks Task, and task switching.

Main Results:

  • Shapebuilder demonstrated a strong common factor loading with complex working memory span tasks.
  • It effectively predicted performance on quantitative reasoning, Raven's Progressive Matrices, conditional go/no-go, and N-back tasks.
  • Shapebuilder exhibited minimal skew and kurtosis, good reliability, and weak or nonsignificant correlations with the Attention Networks Task and task switching.

Conclusions:

  • Shapebuilder is a valid and reliable measure that captures complex working memory abilities.
  • Its advantages include being largely language-independent, not prone to ceiling effects, and having a short completion time (under 6 minutes).
  • Shapebuilder offers a promising alternative to existing working memory assessment tools.