Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity
Published on: September 20, 2024
Microincision versus Standard Corneal Incision Phacoemulsification: Visual Outcome.
Vaibhav K Jain1, Sudarshan Khokhar, Aniruddha Agarwal
1*MD †MS Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India (VKJ, SK, MV); Department of Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, India (VKJ); Stanley M. Truhlsen Eye Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska (AA); and Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India (JK, JR).
Microincision (2.2 mm) and standard (2.75 mm) corneal incisions for phacoemulsification yield similar visual outcomes. Both techniques demonstrate comparable surgically induced astigmatism, keratometry, and contrast sensitivity in patients with low astigmatism.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Cataract Surgery
- Corneal Surgery
Background:
- Phacoemulsification is a common cataract surgery technique.
- Corneal incision size can potentially influence surgical outcomes.
- Microincisions aim to minimize surgical trauma and induced astigmatism.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the visual outcomes of microincision (2.2 mm) versus standard (2.75 mm) corneal incision phacoemulsification.
- To evaluate the impact of incision size on surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), keratometry, and contrast sensitivity.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, randomized comparative study involving patients with senile cataract and <1 diopter of astigmatism.
- Two groups: Group 1 (2.2 mm incision) and Group 2 (2.75 mm incision).
- Postoperative assessments included visual acuity, keratometry, contrast sensitivity, and SIA at multiple follow-up intervals up to 6 months.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were observed between the 2.2 mm and 2.75 mm incision groups in terms of SIA (0.54 D vs 0.58 D, p=0.27).
- Visual acuity (distance and near), keratometry, keratometric cylinder, and contrast sensitivity showed no significant variations between groups.
- Surgically induced astigmatism remained consistently low and comparable in both groups throughout the 6-month follow-up.
Conclusions:
- Both 2.2 mm and 2.75 mm clear corneal incisions are effective for phacoemulsification in patients with less than 1 D of preoperative astigmatism.
- The choice of incision size (microincision vs. standard) does not significantly impact postoperative visual outcomes, including SIA, keratometry, and contrast sensitivity.
- Microincision cataract surgery offers comparable results to standard incision surgery, supporting its use in appropriate patient populations.
More Related Videos
05:14Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
Published on: September 16, 2025
04:59Author Spotlight: Enhancing Visual Outcomes in Cataract Surgery: A Novel Technique to Prevent Posterior Capsular Opacification Through IOL Rotation
Published on: July 7, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...