Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

07:21
The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content
Published on: June 29, 2016
41.4K
Matching Your Face or Appraising the Situation: Two Paths to Emotional Contagion
Frontiers in Psychology
|January 23, 2018
Summary
Emotional contagion for happiness and anger differs. Happiness spreads via mimicry, while anger relies on social appraisal, indicating distinct emotional processing pathways.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Affective Science
- Cognitive Neuroscience
Background:
- Emotions are understood to converge through emotional mimicry and social appraisal.
- The mechanisms underlying emotional contagion for different emotions remain incompletely understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the emotional contagion of anger and happiness.
- To investigate the roles of emotional mimicry and social appraisal in the contagion of these emotions.
Main Methods:
- Experiment 1: Recorded facial electromyography (EMG) from zygomaticus major and corrugator supercilii to measure mimicry while participants viewed angry and happy faces. Self-reported emotions assessed contagion.
- Experiment 2: Manipulated social appraisal by altering the gaze direction of facial expressions toward the participant.
Main Results:
- Both anger and happiness showed emotional contagion in both experiments.
- Happiness contagion was associated with overt facial mimicry (Experiment 1), whereas anger contagion was not.
- Social appraisal influenced anger contagion but not happiness contagion (Experiment 2).
Conclusions:
- Emotional mimicry and social appraisal play differential roles in emotional contagion.
- Happiness contagion appears to be primarily driven by mimicry.
- Anger contagion necessitates social appraisal, suggesting distinct neural and cognitive pathways for different emotion types.
Related Concept Videos
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
56.2K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
56.2K
Mean free path and Mean free time
5.3K
Consider the gas molecules in a cylinder. They move in a random motion as they collide with each other and change speed and direction. The average of all the path lengths between collisions is known as the "mean free path."
5.3K
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
434
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
434
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
2.1K
Cognitive psychologist Richard Lazarus proposed the cognitive-mediational theory of emotions, which emphasizes how individuals' assessments of stressors significantly affect their experience of stress. According to Lazarus, the stress response is determined by a two-step appraisal process: primary appraisal and secondary appraisal. These cognitive appraisals help individuals evaluate the potential impact of a stressor and determine the adequacy of their coping resources.
Primary Appraisal:...
Primary Appraisal:...
2.1K
Path Between Thermodynamics States
4.1K
Consider the two thermodynamic processes involving an ideal gas that are represented by paths AC and ABC in Figure 1:
4.1K
Interference: Path Lengths
2.3K
Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
2.3K

