Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Evaluation of Capillary and Other Vessel Contribution to Macular Perfusion Density Measured with Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
Published on: February 18, 2022
Reproducibility of Macular Vessel Density Calculations Via Imaging With Two Different Swept-Source Optical Coherence
Takuhei Shoji1, Yuji Yoshikawa1, Junji Kanno1
1Department of Ophthalmology, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) systems show good reproducibility for measuring macular vessel density. The PLEXElite device demonstrated superior performance with fewer poor images and higher reproducibility compared to the Triton system.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Medical Imaging
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) is crucial for visualizing retinal vasculature.
- Swept-source OCTA (SS-OCTA) offers enhanced penetration and speed for OCTA imaging.
- Standardized vessel density calculations are essential for clinical applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the reproducibility of vessel density measurements between two commercial SS-OCTA systems (PLEXElite and Triton).
- To evaluate the impact of different binarization methods on vessel density reproducibility.
- To assess image quality and identify factors affecting measurement reliability.
Main Methods:
- Two SS-OCTA devices (PLEXElite and Triton) were used to image healthy volunteers' maculae.
- A 3x3mm volume scan pattern centered on the fovea was employed.
- Six binarization methods (two global, four local adaptive) in ImageJ were applied to calculate vessel density.
- Sixty eyes from 30 healthy subjects were analyzed by two masked reviewers.
Main Results:
- Twenty-two eyes were excluded due to poor image quality, with Triton showing significantly more exclusions (P=0.003).
- Local adaptive thresholding methods yielded higher reproducibility than global thresholding for both devices.
- Coefficients of variation for vessel density ranged from 0.3% to 2.3% for PLEXElite and 0.6% to 4.7% for Triton.
Conclusions:
- Both SS-OCTA instruments demonstrated good reproducibility for macular vessel density measurements.
- PLEXElite exhibited better performance with fewer excluded images and higher reproducibility than Triton.
- These findings aid in selecting appropriate binarization techniques for detecting retinal vascular diseases.
Related Concept Videos
Calculating the Equilibrium Constant
For example, gaseous nitrogen dioxide forms dinitrogen tetroxide according to this equation:
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes
Calculating pH Changes in a Buffer Solution
Numerical Calculations
The solution to a problem is obtained using different methods. While manually solving algebraic symbols is one of the most common methods, the graphical method is often preferred. Computers...
Net Torque Calculations

