Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

309
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
309
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

31.2K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
31.2K
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

42.6K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
42.6K
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies02:09

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

41.6K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
41.6K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

406
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
406
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

9.7K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
9.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Process explanations of age-related changes in memory specificity.

Psychology and aging·2026
Same author

Semantic similarity disrupts order recall: Returning the black sheep of similarity effects to the flock.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Toward a comprehensive account of verbal memory: An embedded computational model across representational domains.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Bilingualism and individual differences in short-term ordered serial recall.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same author

Long-term representational costs of overloading working memory.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Error Cancellation During Early Task Performance.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Test Format Matching Moderates the Forward Testing Effect.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Affective-Motivational Task Content and Stimulus Size Modulate Cognitive Control in Task Switching.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

The Effect of Violent Virtual Avatar Experience on Players' Response Inhibition to Angry Expressions and Its Cognitive Neural Mechanisms.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Same Person, Different Personality?

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Competition Matters!

Experimental psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 3, 2025

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

8.2K

Testing a Strategy-Disruption Account of the List-Strength Effect.

Tyler M Ensor1,2, Tyler D Bancroft3, Dominic Guitard4

  • 1California State University Bakersfield, Bakersfield, CA, USA.

Experimental Psychology
|October 28, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Repeating items on a study list enhances memory recall, known as item strengthening. However, the list-strength effect (LSE) observed in free recall does not appear in recognition tasks, suggesting different memory processes.

Keywords:
episodic memoryitem strengtheninglist-strength effectoutput interferencerecognition

More Related Videos

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.4K
Assessment of Stress Effects on Cognitive Flexibility using an Operant Strategy Shifting Paradigm
07:26

Assessment of Stress Effects on Cognitive Flexibility using an Operant Strategy Shifting Paradigm

Published on: May 4, 2020

3.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 3, 2025

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

8.2K
New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.4K
Assessment of Stress Effects on Cognitive Flexibility using an Operant Strategy Shifting Paradigm
07:26

Assessment of Stress Effects on Cognitive Flexibility using an Operant Strategy Shifting Paradigm

Published on: May 4, 2020

3.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Item strengthening through repeated presentation enhances memorability.
  • The list-strength effect (LSE) demonstrates enhanced memory for strengthened items and depressed memory for unstrengthened items in mixed lists.
  • LSE is well-documented in free recall but absent in recognition tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the reasons behind the absence of the list-strength effect (LSE) in recognition memory.
  • To test the hypothesis that randomization of test probes in recognition disrupts the sampling bias and output interference mechanisms observed in free recall.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on list-strength effect in free recall and recognition.
  • Presentation of pilot experiments exploring the role of probe randomization.
  • Conducting a registered experiment with high statistical power to validate findings.

Main Results:

  • Pilot experiments provided preliminary support for the probe randomization hypothesis.
  • The registered experiment, with increased statistical power, did not find evidence to support the proposed account for the null LSE in recognition.

Conclusions:

  • The initial hypothesis explaining the null list-strength effect in recognition memory was not supported by the main experiment.
  • Further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms differentiating memory performance in free recall versus recognition tasks.