Ancestral Background Is Underreported in Regenerative Engineering

The ancestral background of human cells may play a role in cells' behavior and response to therapeutic interventions in vitro. We investigate the prevalence of ancestry reporting in current biological research and suggest that increased reporting would be beneficial to the field.

Articles published over a six-month period in ten different journals were reviewed for their use of human primary cells and immortalized cell lines, and were analyzed based on whether or not the ancestral or ethnic information of cell donors was ascertainable.

The vast majority of literature published in the journals and timeframe we investigated did not report on the ancestral or ethnic origins of the human cells used.

There is currently a substantial lack of reporting on the ancestral background of human cells used for research. We suggest that increased ancestral reporting should be implemented in order to improve the development of precision medicine.

Many diseases affect patients of different ancestral backgrounds in a variety of ways. In this perspective article, we raise the concern that, since many scientists do not consider ancestry when designing their studies, their results may not apply to all patients. We use data to show that very few scientists report on the ancestry of the donors who contribute cells and tissues to their research. We suggest that broader reporting on donor ancestry would improve biomedical research and would help doctors to personalize treatments for their patients.Future work includes further increasing awareness of the importance of including ancestry as a variable in experimental design, as well as promoting increased reporting on ancestry in the research community.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40883-021-00237-8.