Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Masking level difference: an electrophysiological approach.

Z Kevanishvili, Z Lagidze

    Scandinavian Audiology
    |January 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    STUTTERING: INITIATING FACTORS, EVOLUTION, HEALING PERSPECTIVES.

    Georgian medical news·2021
    Same author

    EFFECT OF SMOKING ON TRASIENTLY EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION.

    Georgian medical news·2016
    Same author

    Cytomegalovirus bearing in children with sensorineural hearing losses.

    Georgian medical news·2012
    Same author

    Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in cochlear implant users.

    Georgian medical news·2007
    Same author

    Does vitamin E prevent gentamicin-induced ototoxicity?

    Georgian medical news·2007
    Same author

    Reflection of bounce phenomenon in TEOAE in humans: dependence upon test-stimulus parameters.

    Georgian medical news·2007
    Same journal

    Vision and hearing in old age.

    Scandinavian audiology·2002
    Same journal

    Two families with phenotypically different hereditary low frequency hearing impairment: longitudinal data and linkage analysis.

    Scandinavian audiology·2002
    Same journal

    Age and noise-induced hearing loss.

    Scandinavian audiology·2002
    Same journal

    Bilateral hearing aids--effects and consequences from a user perspective.

    Scandinavian audiology·2002
    Same journal

    Threshold-based fitting methods for non-linear (WDRC) hearing instruments--comparison of acoustic characteristics.

    Scandinavian audiology·2002
    Same journal

    Will hearing healthcare be affordable in the new millennium.

    Scandinavian audiology·2001
    See all related articles

    The masking level difference, a binaural hearing phenomenon, is primarily processed at the cortical level. This study found slow cortical potentials (SCPs) changed significantly, unlike auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) and middle latency responses (MLRs).

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Auditory Neuroscience
    • Psychoacoustics

    Background:

    • Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs), middle latency responses (MLRs), and slow cortical potentials (SCPs) are electrophysiological measures of auditory processing.
    • The masking level difference (MLD) is a binaural phenomenon where detecting a signal in noise improves when the signal and masker have different interaural configurations.
    • Understanding the neural basis of MLD is crucial for diagnosing and treating auditory processing disorders.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the neural generators of the masking level difference (MLD).
    • To compare the effects of different binaural stimulus conditions on ABRs, MLRs, and SCPs.
    • To determine whether the MLD phenomenon is processed at subcortical or cortical levels.

    Main Methods:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Normal-hearing adults were tested using two stimulus paradigms: S0M0 (in-phase signal and masker) and SπM0 (out-of-phase signal, in-phase masker).
    • Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs), middle latency responses (MLRs), and slow cortical potentials (SCPs) were recorded.
    • Psychoacoustic thresholds were measured to quantify the release from masking.

    Main Results:

    • A significant psychoacoustic release from masking was observed in the SπM0 paradigm compared to S0M0.
    • This release from masking was accompanied by increased amplitudes and shorter peak latencies in slow cortical potentials (SCPs).
    • No significant differences in ABRs or MLRs were found between the two stimulus conditions.

    Conclusions:

    • The masking level difference (MLD) is primarily processed at the cortical level.
    • Slow cortical potentials (SCPs) reflect the neural activity associated with the binaural advantage in noise.
    • Subcortical auditory pathways (ABRs, MLRs) do not appear to be the primary generators of the MLD phenomenon.