Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Optimal Arousal Theory01:23

Optimal Arousal Theory

247
The optimal arousal theory suggests that performance is maximized when an individual experiences a moderate level of arousal. This theory is closely tied to the Yerkes-Dodson law, which illustrates an inverted U-shaped relationship between arousal and performance. The law, formulated by psychologists Robert Yerkes and John Dodson, implies an ideal arousal level for optimal performance, and deviations from this level can lead to declines in effectiveness.
Inverted U-Shaped Performance Curve
The...
247
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.3K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Stability of individual differences in implicitly guided attention.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2023
Same journal

EXPRESS: Age-related Differences in Recognition Memory for Discourse: The Case of Modified Words, Competitors, and Related Lures.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Exaggerated Self-Referencing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Post-Error Adjustments: The role of Response Stimulus Intervals and error placement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Mitigating the Low Prevalence Effect: Role of Removing Explicit "Target-Absent" Responses in Visual Search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Visual Selection Is Spatially Constrained During Working Memory Consolidation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Cross-Phoneme Generalisation of Dimension-Based Statistical Learning for Stop Voicing: Probing Subject Design and Word Frame Effects.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 12, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K

The attentional boost effect overcomes dual-task interference in choice-response tasks.

Vanessa G Lee1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|January 30, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Responding to a target in one task can surprisingly improve memory for a second task. This attentional boost from target detection overrides typical dual-task interference, even with complex response selection.

Keywords:
Attentional boost effectdual-task processingresponse selectiontarget detection

More Related Videos

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

9.2K
The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents
09:43

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents

Published on: August 10, 2014

46.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 12, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K
A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

9.2K
The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents
09:43

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents

Published on: August 10, 2014

46.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Dual-task interference occurs when performing two tasks simultaneously, often leading to a Psychological Refractory Period.
  • Response selection, especially with arbitrary rules, typically hinders concurrent task processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether response selection in one task can enhance, rather than hinder, the processing of a secondary task.
  • To examine the impact of target detection on memory encoding during dual-task performance.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a memory encoding task (object pictures) concurrently with a visual monitoring task (rapid serial visual presentation - RSVP).
  • The RSVP task included targets requiring a button press and distractors to be ignored.
  • Memory for encoded pictures was tested after target and distractor trials.

Main Results:

  • Pictures encoded during target trials of the RSVP task were remembered better than those encoded during distractor trials.
  • This memory enhancement occurred despite the increased response selection demands on target trials.
  • Findings contradict predictions of dual-task interference models.

Conclusions:

  • Response selection in a primary task does not always impede secondary task processing.
  • Attentional benefits from detecting targets can overcome interference from complex response selection.
  • This suggests a paradoxical enhancement effect in dual-task scenarios.