Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Click polarity inversion effects upon the human brainstem auditory evoked potential

Z Kevanishvili, V Aphonchenko

    Scandinavian Audiology
    |January 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary

    Brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) differ based on click phase. Rarefaction clicks enhanced early wave amplitudes, while condensation clicks boosted Wave V, impacting peak latencies for auditory brainstem response analysis.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    STUTTERING: INITIATING FACTORS, EVOLUTION, HEALING PERSPECTIVES.

    Georgian medical news·2021
    Same author

    EFFECT OF SMOKING ON TRASIENTLY EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION.

    Georgian medical news·2016
    Same author

    Cytomegalovirus bearing in children with sensorineural hearing losses.

    Georgian medical news·2012
    Same author

    Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in cochlear implant users.

    Georgian medical news·2007
    Same author

    Does vitamin E prevent gentamicin-induced ototoxicity?

    Georgian medical news·2007
    Same author

    Reflection of bounce phenomenon in TEOAE in humans: dependence upon test-stimulus parameters.

    Georgian medical news·2007

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Auditory Neuroscience
    • Neurophysiology

    Background:

    • Brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) are crucial for assessing auditory pathway function.
    • Click phase (rarefaction vs. condensation) can influence BAEP parameters.
    • Understanding these phase-dependent effects is vital for accurate electrophysiological assessments.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the impact of rarefaction (R) and condensation (C) click phases on BAEP parameters.
    • To analyze differences in wave amplitudes and peak latencies between R and C click phases.
    • To determine if low-intensity click phases affect BAEP components.

    Main Methods:

    • Recording BAEPs in response to high-intensity rarefaction and condensation clicks.
    • Measuring amplitudes and peak latencies of BAEP waves (I, II, III, IV, V, VI).

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparing BAEP parameters obtained with R and C click phases.

    • Main Results:

    • Amplitudes of Waves I, II, and IV were significantly greater with R clicks.
    • Amplitude of Wave V was greater with C clicks.
    • Peak latencies of Waves I and VI were shorter with R clicks; other components tended to shorten with C clicks.
    • At low stimulus intensities, preserved BAEP components (Waves III, V, VI) showed no noticeable change with click phase inversion.

    Conclusions:

    • Click phase significantly influences BAEP parameters, particularly amplitudes and latencies of early and middle components.
    • Wave V amplitude is favored by condensation clicks, while early waves (I, II, IV) are enhanced by rarefaction clicks.
    • These findings highlight the importance of considering click phase in BAEP interpretation, especially at high stimulus intensities.