Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Measurement of X-ray Beam Coherence along Multiple Directions Using 2-D Checkerboard Phase Grating
Published on: October 11, 2016
Implant Orientation Measurement After THA Using the EOS X-Ray Image Acquisition System
Kunihiko Tokunaga1, Masashi Okamoto2, Kenji Watanabe3
1Niigata Hip Joint Center, Kameda Daiichi Hospital, Niigata City, Japan. ktokunagajp@yahoo.co.jp.
The EOS system shows potential for measuring total hip arthroplasty (THA) implant orientation, but accuracy issues with cup inclination, anteversion, and stem antetorsion require improvement before clinical use.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Medical Imaging
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Accurate measurement of implant orientation is crucial for successful total hip arthroplasty (THA).
- The EOS system offers a low-dose imaging solution for evaluating implant positioning in a standing position.
- Current limitations exist in applying 3D bone models for precise reference point definition.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the accuracy of the EOS system for measuring implant orientation (cup inclination, anteversion, and femoral stem antetorsion) after THA.
- To compare EOS measurements with computed tomography (CT) scans, considered a gold standard.
- To identify potential sources of error and limitations of the EOS system in this application.
Main Methods:
- Ninety patients undergoing THA were analyzed.
- Implant orientation was measured using the EOS system and compared to CT scans with 3D analysis software (ZedHip).
- Measurements included cup inclination and anteversion relative to the anterior pelvic plane (APP), and stem antetorsion relative to the femoral functional axis.
Main Results:
- Mean differences between EOS and CT were -2.3° ± 2.7° for cup inclination, -0.1° ± 5.0° for cup anteversion, and -1.3° ± 6.5° for stem antetorsion.
- Outlier measurements (differences > 5°) were observed in 14 hips for cup inclination, 28 for cup anteversion, and 27 for stem antetorsion.
- Difficulties in defining APP reference points and discrepancies in the APP coordinate system contributed to measurement outliers.
Conclusions:
- The EOS system demonstrated variability in measuring implant orientation after THA, particularly for cup anteversion and stem antetorsion.
- Challenges with reference point definition on 3D models and inconsistencies in the APP coordinate system limit the current accuracy of the EOS system for THA implant positioning.
- Further improvements are needed to enhance the reliability and clinical applicability of the EOS system for post-THA implant assessment.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
X-ray Imaging
X-ray Crystallography
Diffraction
Diffraction is the change in the direction of travel experienced by an electromagnetic wave when it encounters a physical barrier whose dimensions are comparable to those of the wavelength of the light. X-rays are electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths about as long as the distance between neighboring...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
Light Acquisition
Location and Orientation of the Heart
Methods of Documentation I: Source-Oriented Records
In an SOR, each discipline involved in patient care maintains a separate medical record section. This record-keeping method enables easy tracking of patient progress and ensures healthcare staff have access to up-to-date information.
Key Attributes include the following:

