Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

National Nursing Organizations II

National Nursing Organizations II

Nursing organizations play a vital role in representing nurses working in specialized clinical settings, such as the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN).
The AACN emphasizes a healthy work environment through six standards to achieve an optimal patient outcome. The standards are appropriate staffing, meaningful recognition, collaboration, authentic leadership, effective communication, and decision-making. In addition, AACN provides certification programs, webinars, journals, and...

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.

Current Trends in Nursing II

Current Trends in Nursing II

Trends in nursing are multifactorial and associated with changes in society, within the nursing profession, and in other professions. Notably, telehealth and remote nursing contribute to successful healthcare delivery for numerous patients and help reduce stress for nurses due to nursing shortages. Nurses can reach patients, monitor their conditions, and interact with them using computers, audio, visual accessories, and telephones—for example, remote patient monitoring systems. Likewise,...

Nursing Implementation

Nursing Implementation

Implementation is the execution of the nursing care plan developed during the planning phase.
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.

Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse I

Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse I

Accountability in nursing is a fundamental principle that underscores the obligation of nurses to take responsibility for their actions and answer for any errors or omissions in patient care. This principle is grounded in the professional, legal, and ethical frameworks that shape nursing practice. For instance, nurses must adhere to all relevant laws, regulations, and practice standards, including guidelines set forth by nursing boards and professional bodies, to ensure their actions comply...

Nursing Clinical Information System

Nursing Clinical Information System

Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS)
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Implementing an Alternative Patient Care Technician Staffing Model on a Medical Unit: A Cross-Sectional Study.

The American journal of nursing·2026

Same author

Charting and Predicting Risk: Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Pilot Model for Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries.

Journal of nursing care quality·2026

Same author

Evaluating the Impact of Community Resiliency Model® Training on Nurse Wellness and Job Outcomes.

Journal for nurses in professional development·2026

Same author

Building a model for retention: Every student counts.

Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing·2026

Same author

Evaluating the WE CARE Program's Impact on Job Satisfaction and Intent to Leave.

Journal of advanced nursing·2026

Same author

A Mixed Methods Analysis of Recognition Satisfaction and Preferences Among Nurses.

The Journal of nursing administration·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 5, 2025

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

Innovations in Evaluating Nursing Academic Practice Partnerships.

Shea Polancich¹, Rebecca Miltner, Terri Poe

¹Author Affiliations: Assistant Dean/Associate Professor Joint-Appointment (Dr Polancich), University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing; Chief Nursing Officer/Vice President Nursing (Dr Poe), University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital; and Director, Educationally Focused Practice Partnerships and Associate Professor (Dr Miltner), Dean (Dr Harper), Senior Associate Dean Academic Affairs (Dr Moneyham), and Associate Dean, Clinical and Global Partnerships (Dr Shirey), University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing.

The Journal of Nursing Administration

|May 19, 2021

Summary

Formalized academic-practice partnerships, crucial for healthcare needs, often lack standardized outcome evaluations. This article details a process for creating an evaluation blueprint to assess these vital collaborations.

More Related Videos

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 5, 2025

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Area of Science:

Nursing Education
Healthcare Partnerships
Program Evaluation

Background:

Academic-practice partnerships are encouraged by the American Association of Colleges of Nursing to address healthcare and societal needs.
Despite their long history, evaluating the outcomes of these partnerships lacks a standardized and robust framework.
A consistent evaluation method is needed to understand the impact and effectiveness of academic-practice collaborations.

Purpose of the Study:

To describe the development and implementation of an evaluation blueprint.
To provide a structured approach for appraising academic-practice partnerships.
To address the need for standardized outcome assessment in nursing education-practice collaborations.

Main Methods:

The article outlines a specific organization's systematic process.
Methods involved creating a comprehensive evaluation blueprint.
Implementation strategies for the blueprint are discussed.

Main Results:

A detailed evaluation blueprint was developed and implemented.
The process established a structured framework for assessing partnership outcomes.
The organization gained a standardized method for partnership appraisal.

Conclusions:

Developing a standardized evaluation blueprint is feasible and necessary.
A structured approach enhances the assessment of academic-practice partnerships.
This work provides a model for other organizations seeking to evaluate similar collaborations.